Застосування запобіжного заходу у вигляді тримання під вартою

Abstract

Розглянуто поняття і суть заходу забезпечення кримінального провадження у вигляді тримання під вартою. Висвітлено основні аспекти забезпечення процесуальних гарантій прав, свобод та законних інтересів особи при обранні запобіжного заходу у вигляді тримання під вартою у кримінальному провадженні. Досліджено теоретичні й практичні проблемні питання, що виникають при застосуванні у кримінальному провадженні запобіжного заходу у вигляді тримання під вартою. In the article the issues of application of such measure as confinement are examined. Main problems of ensuring and compliance with procedural guarantees of the rights, freedoms and lawful interests of the suspect are highlighted, since this kind of preventive measures as confinement is considered to be the strictest of all types of precautionary measures stipulated by the current Criminal Procedural Code of Ukraine. Conclusions that the implemented changes to the Article 176 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, the Law of Ukraine «On alterations to the Criminal and Criminal Procedural Codes of Ukraine regarding the inevitability of punishment for certain crimes against national security, public safety and corruption offenses» made by the author significantly worsened the situation of persons who are suspected of having committed certain offenses, require the investigating judge, court decision on the application request in custody in the presence of suspected offenses referred to in Part 5 of Article 176 of the Criminal Procedural Code of Ukraine, violating proportionality, one of the fundamental principles of the rule of law. Theoretical and practical issues that arise in the application of the criminal proceedings as a preventive measure of detention are examined, including: continuation of detention period during the period from the date of receipt of the indictment act in court and before the preparatory trial; disregard of law to courts reasonable time in the criminal proceedings against persons who are detained for more than 6 months; unmotivated statement and unfounded list of risks and circumstances that make it possible to apply the present measure in the request for the use of confinement in most cases.