Процесуальне оформлення фактичного затримання людини співробітником оперативного підрозділу

Abstract

Окреслено актуальне нині питання правомірності процесуального оформлення фактичного затримання людини уповноваженою службовою особою суб’єкта оперативно-розшукової діяльності до моменту внесення відомостей про злочин до Єдиного реєстру досудових розслідувань. Проаналізовано норми Кримінального процесуального кодексу, що стосуються затримання, у практичній діяльності оперативних підрозділів, які дедалі частіше не виконуються через неоднозначне їх трактування органами досудового розслідування, прокуратури, захисниками, а іноді й суб’єктом оперативно-розшукової діяльності, що негативно впливає на дотримання законних інтересів затриманого, а отже, і подальше причинно-наслідкове забезпечення кримінального судочинства. The problem of legality of procedural implementation of actual person’s arrest by an authorized official of the subject of investigative activities until the moment of entering data about a crime to the Unified Register of Pre-Trial Investigations remains relevant these days. Consequently, norms of the Code of Criminal Procedure as to the arrest are often not executed in practical activities of operating subdivisions due to their controversial interpretation by the authorities of pretrial investigation, prosecution, defense attorneys, and sometimes even by the subject of investigative activities, which has a negative effect on respecting legal interests of an arrested person and further cause to effect provision of criminal procedure. It has been investigated and proved that an operating subdivision employee committing actual arrest has an opportunity regulated by the Code of Criminal Procedure and shall make a detention report, as the specified authorized official was present at a place of an accident, performed qualification and classification of criminal activity and grounds for arrest, and also took part in application of public enforcement in the interest of the society and its citizens. An operating subdivision employee knows information about the process of arrest instead of an investigator making a detention report according to its members or information mentioned in an operative report. We think that a lawmaker has intentionally emphasized a separate article in the Code of Criminal Procedure, which regulates arrest by an authorized official that unlike an ordinary citizen has to be knowledgeable in the sphere of criminal law and law of criminal procedure, science of criminal law, tactical and special training etc, which enable to find a proper solution in an unusual (suspicious) situation, determine a dangerous situation, arrest and bring a person, as well as prepare a proper detention report. As a result, these will provide an opportunity to perform criminal procedure. A detention report is a ground for entering data about the identified crime to the Unified Register of Pre-Trial Investigations by an investigator.