Розмір неправомірної вигоди у складі злочину, передбаченому в ст. 368 Кримінального кодексу України

Abstract

З’ясовано питання про розмір неправомірної вигоди у складі злочину, передбаченому в статті 368 Кримінального кодексу України. Проаналізовано особливості регламентації цього питання за чинним кримінальним законодавством України. Досліджено розуміння цього поняття у судовій практиці і в кримінально-правовій літературі. Висвітлено регламентацію зазначеного питання в адміністративному законодавстві України. Виявлено співвідношення кримінального і адміністративного законодавства в цій частині. Обґрунтовано мінімальний розмір неправомірної вигоди, за наявності якого має наставати кримінальна відповідальність за вказаний склад злочину. The scientific article is dedicated to the ascertaining of the rate of illegal benefit in the body of the crime foreseen in the article 368 of the Criminal code of Ukraine. The peculiarities of regulation of this problem are analysed according to the valid Criminal Code of Ukraine. The sense and meaning of this question is re-searched in the judicial practice and criminal-legal literature. It is argued that the rate of illegal benefit is poorly investigated in the criminal-legal literature. Some authors suggested setting the rate of illegal benefit on the level of ten non-taxable minimum incomes without any arguments. The other scientists expressed the view about the necessity of such a body of the crime as little passive bribe. There is no any explanation concerning the rate of illegal benefit in the resolutions of the Su-preme Court of Ukraine. There was criminal and administrative liability for getting illegal benefit in the rate until five non-taxable minimum incomes for almost two years simultaneous-ly. Appropriate actions have been qualified as an administrative offense in the judi-cial practice. The identical definition of the notion «illegal benefit» is in the law of Ukraine «About prevention of Corruption». Currently there is no administrative liability for getting illegal benefit. From our point of view it is necessary to set the rate of illegal benefit on the legislative level. The liability for the passive bribe is foreseen at the Model Criminal Code of Commonwealth of Independent States. The rate of bribe in this law is on the level of one minimum salary defined in the legisla-tion. This Model criminal code is supposed to be as a recommendatory legislative act for the members of this Commonwealth. According to the law of Ukraine «About prevention of Corruption» corresponding subjects can get gifts at the rate below one minimum salary defined in the legislation. The minimum rate of illegal benefit which is taken by the non-official person is non-defined also. The minimum rate of fine for this crime is 4250 UAH. In my opinion, the rate of illegal benefit in this body of the crime is to be below the mini-mum rate of fine. The minimum rate of illegal benefit which is taken by the official is to be below than that for non-official person. That is why the rate of illegal benefit in the body of the crime foreseen in the article 368 of the Criminal code of Ukraine is to be one minimum salary defined in the legislation.