Методи дослідження проблематики адміністративного права

Abstract

Розглянуто ті концепції систематизації методів пізнання права, які, на думку авторів статті, вирізняються своєю ґрунтовністю. Обговорено найбільш знану в пострадянській юриспруденції спробу наукового опрацювання питання про методи пізнання адміністративного права. Показано хибність деяких положень, сформульованих у рамках цієї спроби. The actuality of the article is closely connected with the need to develop the theory and improve the practice of administrative law. Its purpose is to offer an answer to the question of what a system of methods for the problem of administrative law cognition constitutes, an issue that is still not enough developed in this area of legal science. The concepts of systematization of methods of legal science, which in the opinion of the authors of the article are distinguished by their thoroughness, are considered. In this context: 1) the shortcomings of the concepts referred to are indicated and the reasons for their elimination are stated; 2) it was found out that the basis of the consideration of the system of research methods of the problems of administrative law is advisable to put the idea that the subsystems of the system should be interpreted as blocks of research tools, and not as the level of methodology of knowledge, distinguished in legal science under the influence of the theory proposed system the approach of the general scheme of levels of methodological analysis. The authors discussed the most known in post-Soviet jurisprudence attempts to study the issue of methods of knowledge of administrative law. The incompetence of some suggestions expressed in this attempt has been shown. The research also concludes that the methods of cognition of administrative law compose a system, the subsystems of which are: 1) philosophical and attitudinal methods (dialectical and metaphysical); 2) general scientific (logical methods, modeling, etc.); 3) concrete-scientific (concrete sociological, cybernetic, etc.); 4) actual legal (conceptual, ontological, logistic, comparative law, legal, legal-psychological methods, method of administrative-legal forecasting, etc.); 5) intuitive methods (intellectual intuition, etc.); 6) the research methods needed to ensure the interdisciplinary nature of the study of administrative law issues.