Агресивність військовослужбовців в аспекті психічного здоров'я

Abstract

Розглянуто основні поняття та види агресивності, розкрито сутність і природу агресивної поведінки особистості. Наведено результати емпірично-го дослідження, спрямованого на вивчення психологічних особливостей агре-сивної поведінки військовослужбовців-учасників бойових дій в зоні антитерористичної операції, пов’язаних із політикою, особистим досвідом, вихованням, спортом та ЗМІ. Виявлено реакції агресії на зовнішній чинник у поведінці військовозобов’язаних і невійськовозобов’язаних. The article describes the basic concepts and types of aggression, reveals the essence and the nature of aggressive behavior of the individual. The author brings the results of empirical research aimed at studying the psychological characteristics of aggressive behavior of military men – combatants in the area of anti-terrorist operation in the East of Ukraine (ATO), which are related to politics, personal experience, education, sport and media. The reaction of aggression to external factors in the behavior of military men and nonmilitary men is discovered. Aggressive behavior of the researched groups is studied with the aim to reveal the basic research questions about the peculiarities of aggressive behavior of military men. The following methods were used for the research: «Questionnaire of legitimized aggression is designed to measure aggression», test «Wagner Hand». The method of legitimized aggression made it possible to measure aggression that is socially acceptable, legitimized; test «Wagner Hand» made it possible to measure the reaction to aggression. The study (June – September 2016) was attended by 90 people (a group of soldiers who served in the ATO n = 30; a group of soldiers who did not serve n = 30 and nonmilitary men group n = 30) – the military men aged from 17 to 45 years old. All the participants of the research were selected by age indicator and military obligation. In conclusion it is stated that in military sphere aggressive manifestations occur very often; they cause negative impact on the interaction of military personnel, on their interpersonal relationships and prevent effective preparedness and training to perform the military tasks. According to the results of empirical research the highest indicators of integral aggression are typical for military men and nonmilitary men. But nonmilitary men are characterized by expressed integral aggression in comparison to military men who have served in ATO and military men, who haven’t served.