Правові висновки верховного суду з питань застосування норм адміністративного законодавства

Abstract

Здійснено порівняльний аналіз законодавчого поняття «правовий вис- новок» у адміністративній справі з суміжними поняттями у контексті про- ведення судової реформи, визначення їх місця у структурі судового рішення. Наголошено на необхідності законодавчого закріплення відповідних дефініцій та обґрунтовано потребу внесення окремих змін до КАС України, а саме: до- повнити чинне законодавство нормою, що передбачала б обов’язок виокрем- лювати у межах рішення правовий висновок та встановити можливість від- ходу від правового висновку Верховного Суду. Under implementation of reformative law-making processes in Ukraine, the content and functional purpose of the administrative process, which, through the established multi structure and gradation and holding a major role in regulation of social relations in various spheres of legal life, is substantially modified. As a consequence the number of procedural mechanisms of the administrative process increases, including various, sometimes contradictory content, which complicates their application, and therefore, the issue of the implementation of the latter in all forms of social life requires an update. In order to ensure the protection of the rights, freedoms, legitimate interests of citizens and the state, not only the availability of the above-mentioned mechanisms, but also the real possibility of their use, is important. All this requires a thorough examination of the institution’s capability in implementation of the norms of the administrative process from the side of the highest body in the general jurisdiction of court system – the Supreme Court, whose sphere of activity and main function includes but not limited to provision of uniformity and correctness in the understanding and application of the rules of law. Given that the status and jurisprudence of the latter can only be analyzed through the interconnection with the works and accomplishments of courts that are terminated, there is a need for an analysis of the changes in procedural law powers, in particular the notional apparatus used by the Supreme Court and the Supreme Court of Ukraine.The article attempts a comparative analysis of the legal concepts of «legal conclusion» and «legal position» in the administrative case, as well as interpretation of their place in the structure of the court’s ruling, substantiates the practical necessity for the legislative interpretation of the relevant definitions and justifies the necessity of certain changes to the CAS Ukraine, namely: to supplement the current legislation with the norm, which would include the obligation to draw a legal conclusion in the framework of the ruling and to establish the ability to depart from the ruling of the Supreme Court