Ефективність тлумачення як елемент правотворчої діяльності

Abstract

Досліджено результативність правотворчості й її тлумачення загалом та окремі види тлумачення зокрема. Вказано, що найголовнішого значення набуває питання про зрозумілість для більшості членів суспільства категорій, в яких може бути виражена ефективність актів тлумачення. Проаналізовано результативність усіх інтерпретаційних актів, які значною мірою залежать від точності й зрозумілості юридичних формулювань, їх логічності та послідовності, правильності застосування юридичних понять і термінів. The effectiveness of the interpretation of legal norms is the most important feature of this special form of lawmaking activity. The results of interpretation are mostly judged only by the number of logical errors. However, there are also other approaches to the assessment of lawmaking and law interpreting activity. The authors of the acts of interpretation are often accused of incompetence. The analysis of such assessments of their work shows that they are the same character, because scientifically grounded criteria of interpretation results, its current effectiveness do not exist. In addition, whether it is correct to reflect on the quality of acts of interpretation and the effectiveness of this type of activity in each case of a specific period of time, when lawmaking in the State at present is ineffective in itself taking into consideration the system crisis. The functional effect of the system of «lawmaking and law interpreting» activity can be stipulated by the effective work of all elements of the system as well as the ability of some elements of the system to compensate for comparatively low effectiveness of others. That is, on the one hand, the lawmaking body as the system on the whole could easily carry out something that is beyond power for its elements. On the other hand, elements of the whole can be quite independent, and the effectiveness of some structures easily compensates for inefficiency or complete absence of the others. Obviously, a considerable role belongs to the legal science, and its leading branch – theory of State and law in solving the problems of increasing effectiveness of lawmaking and law interpreting systems. It is obliged to arm the «creators» of legal acts and interpreters with specific recommendations about rational ways of organizing the interpretation, methods of improving all its kinds and forms. A characteristic feature of such researches is that there is a system approach to the study of social and legal phenomena, resulting in detailed analyses not only appropriate legal instructions that regulate the operation of certain types of interpretation and the work of specific legal entities, but also social and legal environment for their existence.