Про поняття "заволодіння" в Кримінальному кодексі України

Abstract

Здійснено спробу ідентифікувати таке кримінально-правове поняття, як заволодіння. Заналізовано особливості регламентації цього питання за чин-ним кримінальним законодавством України. Досліджено зміст і значення поняття у Кримінальному кодексі України та кримінально-правовій літературі, зокрема у постанові Пленуму Верховного Суду України. Висвітлено позицію судової практики в контексті розуміння цього поняття. Запропоновано варіант тлумачення його з урахуванням особливостей конструкції різних складів злочинів. The article is dedicated to the ascertaining of such a criminal-legal notion as seizure. The peculiarities of regulation of this problem according to the valid Criminal code of Ukraine are analyzed. The sense and meaning of this notion is researched in the Criminal code of Ukraine and criminal-legal literature. It is argued that this notion has various criminal-legal sense sometimes. It is proved that underlying notion must have single meaning, but also we have to take into account all the formal elements of a crime. This notion is not used in the General part of the Criminal code of Ukraine. On the other hand it is used almost in twenty articles of Special part of the Criminal code of Ukraine. The sense of the notion «seizure» is clarified sometimes in the valid Criminal code of Ukraine. This criminal-legal notion includes different forms of stealing. The underlying criminal-legal notion contains a reference to the action as the characteristic of the objective side of the body of crime and to the purpose of a crime and is the characteristic of the subjective side of the body of crime. The notion «seizure» is not the type of possible social dangerous consequences. The underlying notion, which is used in articles 191, 262, 308, 312, 313, 410 of the Criminal code of Ukraine has narrower content, than in other cases, because includes only withdrawal corresponding things by means of abuse of power. The highest judicial body in the system of general jurisdiction interpetated the notion «seizure» in it resolution. The sense of this notion is ascertained in the criminal legal literature. There are various points of view concerning also single bodies of the crimes. Judicial practice is rare. The notion «seizure» is analised concerning different bodies of the crime. The notion «stealing» is not used in the valid criminal legislation. That is why it is advisable to take as a basis corresponding doctrinal definition. The notion «seizure» must be interpetated literally in the Criminal code of Ukraine.