Фундаментальні концепції розкриття формо-змістовних характеристик корупції

Abstract

Висвітлено сутність і зміст фундаментальних концепцій розкриття формо-змістовних характеристик корупції в Україні. Зазначено, що історія державотворення засвідчує, що будь-яка держава, незалежно від особливостей організації її інститутів, на певному етапі власного розвитку неодмінно постає перед проблемою нівеляції внутрішньої компоненти публічно-правового суверенітету внаслідок транссуб’єктивізації (неправомірної зміни аутентичного суб’єкта) управлінських повноважень. Визначальним фактором цього процесу виступає корупція. The essence and the meaning of fundamental concepts of discovering formative-content characteristics of corruption in Ukraine is considered in the article. It is noted that the history of the state formation certifies that any state, regardless of the peculiarities of organization of its institutions at a certain stage of its own development inevitably faces the problem of leveling the internal components of public legal sovereignty as a result of the above-mentioned transsubjectivization (illegal change of an authentic entity) of management authorities. Corruption is a significant factor of such process. The appearance of political and territorial organizations of public power with inherent complicated-organized system of administrative institutions determined disproportionalism in the distribution system of social benefits such as power, which thus reinforced the possibility of determining political and legal vector of the society for individual authorized entities. As it is known, any system in its own development tends to the balance of functional parameters, where the society is not an exception the achievements of the balance of the institutions of which guarantees the existence of such formation. Therefore, disproportional distribution of social benefits is a disadvantage that destabilize the social order, leads to obstructive symptoms and social dyssatisfaction. The methods of solving this problem are: the setting of social institutions activity endowed with management functions so that the authorities can’t provide a basis for the protection of individual or closed-grouped interests (minimization of abuses through the use of measures of legal effect) or the alternative illegitimate method of exploitation of authorized resource by unauthorized entities through the exchange of material benefits (illegal advantage) to the actual ability to influence the algorithm of functioning of public institutions.