Повноваження суду під час перегляду рішень за нововиявленими обставинами у цивільному судочинстві

Abstract

Висвітлено питання, пов’язані з повноваженнями суду, якими він наділений під час перегляду рішень за нововиявленими обставинами, згідно з новою редакцією відповідних норм Цивільного процесуального кодексу України. Досліджено проблеми застосування норм про відкриття провадження у зв’язку з нововиявленими обставинами у цивільному судочинстві, сформульовано пропозиції щодо розширення повноважень суду під час перегляду рішень за нововиявленими обставинами. Виявлені прогалини та недоліки окресленого інституту проілюстровано прикладами зі судової практики. The article covers issues related to the powers of the court, by which is is endowed when viewing decisions in connection with new circumstances. Decision or court order, which completed the trial, which entered into the force and a writ can be viewed in relation to new circumstances. In the article author analyzes reasons for reviewing decision, resolution or a court order in connection with the new circumstances which are: essential for business circumstances that were not and could not be known to the person filing the statement during trial; established by the court sentence which entered into the force, deliberately false testimony, knowingly incorrect expert opinion, deliberately wrong translations, false documents or physical evidence that resulted in the adoption of illegal or unreasonable decision; cancellation of a court decision, which became the basis for a decision or resolutions that are subject to revision. The Constitutional Court of Ukraine established the unconstitutionality of the law, other legal act or its separate provisions applied by the court in deciding the case, if the court decision is pending. The problems of application of the rules of opening proceedings in connection with the new circumstances have been researched; proposals for empowering the court in reviewing decisions in the new circumstances have been formulated. The author offers modifications to Ukrainian legislation. To provide qualified judges with the possibility to decide on the acceptance or the refusal of the application for review, CPC of Ukraine should be complemented by rules on grounds of leaving the statement without movement or return it to the applicant. In order to promote the proper settlement of issues related to the opening of the proceedings and to extend the powers of the court the fix grounds for leaving the statement without consideration should be fixed legislatively. It would have been reasonable to determine any possible grounds for the closure of the proceedings, as proceedings in connection with new circumstances are a separate stage of civil process.