Правовий прецедент як джерело права в Україні

Abstract

Проаналізовано теоретико-методологічні засади застосування правового прецедента як джерела права у процесі регулювання суспільних відносин. Правовий прецедент розглянуто як правотворчий акт, що за умов відсутності нормативно-правової регламентації приймається судовим або адміністративним органом в результаті вирішення конкретної юридичної справи та містить у своїх приписах казуальну норму права, якій надається загальнообов՚язкове значення під час вирішення подібних справ у майбутньому. The article analyzes theoretical and methodological foundations of the application of legal precedent as source of law in regulating social relations. Legal precedent is treated as a legislative act that in the absence of the normative-legal regulation was adopted by a judicial or administrative body as a result of solving specific legal cases and provides their prescriptions casual rule of law, which is given a mandatory meaning when dealing with such cases in the future. Legal precedent is an integral element of the system of sources oflaw in any country and serves as the specific legal provisions set forth in the act of the authorized state body (court, Executive authority, «quasi-judicial» organ of administrative justice). In the process of settling a specific legal question in the absence or uncertainty of its legal regulation as it is the legal reference for the solution of the following homogeneous cases. Also, it is argued that a legal precedent is vzaimnosti a judgment expressed in new or modified proproganda elaborated by the judiciary and enshrined in decisions on specific cases and/or acts from the complex of similar specific cases, compulsory for vessels of the same or lower courts in dealing with similar cases, or such a judicial decision that serves as an exemplary specimen of the interpretation is of an Advisory nature. In this case, the priority of propolene developed by the judiciary, is established in accordance with the existing hierarchy of the legal force of the judicial authorities.