Сутність адміністративного переконання

Abstract

В статті піддано критиці наявні в теорії адміністративного права положення, за якими: а) застосування адміністративного переконання є монополією органів державного управління; б) адміністративне переконання не пов’язане з індивідуальним впливом; в) фактична підстава адміністративного переконання завжди відсутня; г) його застосування немає під собою нормативноправової бази. Запропоновано нову дефініцію адміністративного переконання. The relevance of the article is due to the fact that not enough attention is being paid in the scientific and educational legal literature to the problems of administrative conviction, and therefore the questions about its main features and definition remain debatable. The purpose of the article is to find out the essence of administrative conviction. Systematic and historical approaches, methods of analysis and synthesis, comparative method, method of expert assessments were used in the process of realization of this goal. Informational basis of the article are literary sources, Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses, the law "On the National Police". An analysis of the first in the post-Soviet legal literature serious attempt to find out about the features of administrative persuasion has been made. As part of this analysis: 1) it has been shown that the provisions under which: a) the application of an administrative conviction is a monopoly of public authorities; b) administrative conviction is not linked to individual influence; 2) the contradiction between the Ukrainian legislation and the allegations in the legal literature has been pointed out, and it has been confirmed that the factual basis of the administrative conviction is always absent and that its application does not have a regulatory framework; 3) it has been suggested that under the current conditions the primacy of persuasion over coercion should be regarded not as a feature of administrative persuasion but as a desirable tendency for the development of this institution; 4) it has been considered as appropriate to include in the range of features of administrative conviction that: a) it is a universal method of public administration; b) subordination of its influence is voluntary; c) it is a means of preventing and averting an offense Criticism of the view that administrative conviction includes encouragement has been supported. It has been concluded that the administrative conviction is a universal method of public administration, which consists in the application of law enforcement, educational and organizational measures, as well as various means of disseminating information to induce individuals or human groups to behave in accordance with the rules of law and goals, approved by the state, and recognized as socially useful.