Оцінні поняття, використовувані при регламентації тримання під вартою

Abstract

Проаналізовано проблемні питання щодо визначення мети та підстав застосування тримання під вартою. Єдина законна мета тримання під вар-тою (та обґрунтування його виключності) – перешкодити підозрюваному, обвинуваченому ухилитися від слідства і суду, його спробі запобігти встановленню істини у справі, провадити злочинну діяльність чи ухилитися від відбування покарання. Зауважено, що застосування запобіжного заходу у вигляді домашнього арешту щодо неповнолітнього повинно стати загальним правилом за наявності підстав і спеціальних умов, що свідчать про необхідність його суворої ізоляції від суспільства. It is claimed, that the detention as a strictest precaution should be selected only when all the others preventive measures cannot ensure proper behaviour of a suspect, defendant. The only legal purpose of choosing detention (and justify its exclusivity) is obstructing the suspect or accused to evade investigation and court, to prevent the truth in the case to engage criminal activity or to evade punishment. Applying of this preventive measure only due to one of the severity of the crime is excluded. It is stated that the only legitimate purpose of electing detention (and justi-fication for its exclusivity) is that result which is typical for all precautions. An essential disadvantage of the practice a preventive measure as a deten-tion (and continuation of terms of this preventive measure) is that the «lion’s» share decisions of the domestic authorities in their argumenting it is used by the same generalized form and formulaic wording of incorporation with the severity of the crime, that person can avoid the pre-trial investigation or the court, to prevent the truth in case, continue criminal activity, hinder implementation of procedural deci-sions which is already adopted. It is confirmed, that the situations according to which the courts do not present any concrete facts to support their conclusions, it has to be admitted unacceptable. Detention is an exceptional preventive measure. When it is used to minor, approach to the study of such exclusivity must be much more deliberate and meticu-lous. When this preventive measure has to be chosen according to a child, it is nec-essary remember that the law doesn’t allow to select detention in connection with only one severity of committing the crime. Using of such preventive measure as a home detention to a minor, ought to become as the general rule with the grounds and special conditions that indicate the need for its strict isolation from society.